https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854386
--- Comment #7 from Guillermo Gómez <guillermo.gomez(a)gmail.com> ---
Ruby:
[!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %doc %{gem_docdir}
%files doc
%doc %{gem_instdir}/README.markdown
%doc %{gem_dir}/doc << please use rubygem-devel package macros for this.
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
diff).
Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
---
/home/gomix/Fedpkg/fedora-review/854386-rubygem-openstack-quantum-client/srpm/rubygem-openstack-quantum-client.spec
2012-10-26 06:16:54.135068777 -0430
+++
/home/gomix/Fedpkg/fedora-review/854386-rubygem-openstack-quantum-client/srpm-unpacked/rubygem-openstack-quantum-client.spec
2012-10-26 06:16:56.549061667 -0430
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
Name: rubygem-%{gem_name}
Version: 0.1.5
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: The main objective of this gem is to deal easily with openstack
quantum
Heads up, this a false positive BUT, just to make the reviewer life happier,
always include both links, srpm and spec (fedora-review has detected the old
one in bz).
[?]: Empty changelog entry for version 0.1.5-2 ?
%changelog
* Sun Oct 15 2012 Alejandro Pérez <aeperezt(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.1.5-2
* Sun Sep 02 2012 Alejandro Pérez <aeperezt(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.1.5-1
- Initial package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.