https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
--- Comment #79 from Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Warren Togami from comment #75)
Is there a benefit to 'utils' being a subpackage separate
from `bitcoind`?
Many expect -cli to exist in order to manually send commands to their
bitcoind so it is unexpected for it to be installed separately IMO.
I would expect the only reason to not ship them together is if it bloats a
minimal server with deps but that isn't the case?
E.g. I run bitcoind at one host (to store this huge database inplace) and use
bitcoin-cli in another hosts (without any bitcoin service).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.