https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571
Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ngompa13(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Justin W. Flory from comment #9)
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #7)
> It's not. You just forgot to remove the corresponding entry from the %files
> section - and now it can't find the file that you removed - that's all.
(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #8)
> Fabio, I know that our guidelines strongly advise against static linking
> (and bundling in general) but I find it sad to prevent end-users to
> statically build software on top of Fedora if that's what they want and
> upstream provides the means. But if that's our guidelines, I can live
> without the static library and I personally don't care since I integrate
> %{_bindir}/playerctl in my local setup.
I took the middle-ground approach and built a separate, optional package
with the static libraries. The updated commit [1] passed successfully Koji
[2][3] and COPR [4]. An updated SRPM is also available [5].
This is obviously allowed, but in Fedora, we just use "-static" instead of
"-devel-static". The latter is openSUSE's (and long-ago Fedora) naming for
static libraries...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component