https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008090
Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> ---
formal review is here
OK source files match upstream:
8d0028a5ad2267de06bc59d5d81a1df5452c9978 libzdnn-0.3.1.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
OK license field matches the actual license (ASL 2.0)
OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/s390x).
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
OK shared libraries are installed correctly.
OK owns the directories it creates.
OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK no scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK headers in -devel
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no libtool .la droppings.
OK not a GUI app.
the package is APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008090