https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160539
--- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> ---
Thanks for the review (and sorry for the delay)!
(In reply to Sandro from comment #3)
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
==> License file is from GitHub. This is, for the time being, a neat
workaround. Have you filed a request for the license file to be included in
the PyPI tarball? I couldn't find one.
These pypi archives are generated from this master repo, so they've only got
the one copy of license that applies to all the stubs they generate, and they
don't include it in any of the pypi archives:
https://github.com/python/typeshed
I've filed this now:
https://github.com/python/typeshed/issues/9621
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
==> Version 0.19.1.2 is available on PyPI. Please update.
Updated:
Spec URL:
https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-types-docutils/python-types-do...
SRPM URL:
https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-types-docutils/python-types-do...
Cheers,
Ankur
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160539