https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143315
--- Comment #6 from Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> ---
b) This is probably a good discussion to have. Packaging guidelines do require
licenses for
material that is installed. It may have been missed previously, but in my
opinion is good
to do going forward. You pointed out link to license information which I was
not aware of.
Thank you for this. This is the only thing that needs to be clarified for me.
c) Thanks for this information. Maybe something needs to be updated in
fedora-review? This does
not affect the current review.
d) This makes review easier since one of the things to check is if the package
builds on primary
architectures. Will rebuild on copr, but many people will build all the primary
architectures
when submitting for review.
f) Have not done a thorough evaluation of the gem working, but because tests
pass expect it should
work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143315