https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
--- Comment #29 from Carl George 🤠 <carl(a)redhat.com> ---
- deps/glad/include/KHR/khrplatform.h is identified by licensecheck
as being under the Khronos license. I don't see this on the Fedora allowed license
list [2]. It does look quite similar to the MIT license. I did find another package that
took the liberty of using the MIT identifier for Khronos licensed code, but I'm
skeptical that is appropriate. This probably justifies filing an issue with Fedora legal
to get approval for the license and to get it added to the approved list.
Any progress on this item? I noticed that libglvnd-devel contains the file
/usr/include/KHR/khrplatform.h. I don't see that as a directly build
requirement, but your libGL-devel build requirement resolves to
mesa-libGL-devel, which itself requires libglvnd-devel. Can you confirm that
the build is using the system copy instead of the bundled one? If so, consider
deleting the bundled copy in %prep. It would also be good to list
libglvnd-devel as an explicit build requirement to ensure it's always pulled
in.
If it's not unbundle-able, then I recommend following the License Review
Process to get the Khronos license added to the list of allowed licenses.
libglvnd identifies itself as MIT, which I don't think is correct, so this step
would be good regardless.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399