https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406
--- Comment #54 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms> ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #53)
1. I should make this?
License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD
I fail to see why LGPLv2+ is needed. All kinds of mentioned GPL versions of the
source files can be merged into GPLv3+. Please ensure that BSD is also noted as
we've some files licensed with different BSD variants.
It's necessary to add "BSL" or "Boost" (boost license) as well.
Sorry, I've
overlooked that, it's all mentioned in the summary of f-r:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)",
"Unknown or
generated", "BSL (v1.0)", "BSD (3 clause) GPL (v3 or
later)", "BSD (3
clause)", "BSD (2 clause)", "GPL (v2.1) LGPL (v2.1)",
"*No copyright*
GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* GPL (v3 or
later)",
"*No copyright* GPL (v2)". 1203 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/builder/fedora-
review/821406-eiskaltdcpp/licensecheck.txt
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses
2. If I run eiskaltdcpp-qt it start with my (russian) locale. What do
you mean
about "locales for the qt subpackage"?
Okay, thanks for clarification. It was somehow confusing.
4. Requires: perl will be added.
Thanks.
5. Noarch subpackage will be created.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component