Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271
peter(a)thecodergeek.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |peter(a)thecodergeek.com
------- Additional Comments From peter(a)thecodergeek.com 2007-01-24 23:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
[..]
* fields Source0 must be point to the full location of the tarball
for check up.
While this is generally true, it is not the case for source snapshots
(unless
there is a valid URL for it, such as some projects' nightly or weekly CVS tarballs).
(In reply to comment #0)
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/tests
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/scratchspace
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/testarea
E: rhts-test-env non-standard-dir-perm /mnt/testarea 01777
Why are these /mnt directories needed? If they are valid, would they be better
as locations in /srv or similar?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.