https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #54 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan(a)club.fr> ---
I'm eventually going to use LLVM 3.4 instead of requiring a new llvm3.3
package. Julia developers are willing to support several versions of LLVM,
including 3.4 and 3.5.
So the package is ready for the final review (at last! ;-). Anyone willing to
take it?
http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia.spec
http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
(Will require dSFMT from Bug 1108765)
rpmlint SPECS/julia.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/julia-*
julia.x86_64: E: devel-dependency dSFMT-devel
As explained above, currently needed,
but should be fixed in the future.
julia.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/julia/libjulia-debug.so ['$ORIGIN']
julia.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/julia/libjulia.so
['$ORIGIN']
This is required because Julia loads its own private library,
and it works
fine.
julia-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/src/debug/tmp
01777L
No idea about this one, as it's automatically done by debugging symbols
extraction...
julia-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/julia/libjulia-debug.so ['$ORIGIN']
Same as above.
julia-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/man/man1/julia-debug.1.gz julia.1.gz
The link is not dangling, it points
at a file in the julia package.
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component