--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> ---
Boost may be peculiar but that doesn't invalidate anything I said:
Naming the package boots169 is inconsistent with the packaging guidelines. The
other packages are also misnamed, but their existence doesn't excuse including
additional misnamed packages.
You still aren't required to submit a review request. It's fine if you want to
do that, of course; I'm not going to stop you. But you could have simply
submitted the new package request under the exception policy for different
versions of existing packages and have had it imported, built and on its way to
stable by now. I guess it's good that you did, though, or I wouldn't have
noticed and had a chance to correct the improper naming.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component