https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707080
--- Comment #5 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #3)
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #2)
Hopefully all fixed.
> * File /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/10-osmo-fl2k.rules is shipped, but its
> directory is not owned by package or required by the package (systemd-udev
> or kexec-tools).
>
I think this is not needed [1]
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
#_the_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_
to_function
In that example, it says exactly what I mentioned. You might not use Requires,
but still have to own that directory in your package. Unowned directory is not
permitted, even for optional content.
Solution: the evolution package should own the /usr/share/gtk-doc directory.
There is no need to add an explicit Requires on gtk-doc solely for the
directory ownership.
Also, now we have separate libs subpackage, but it has not license file inside
and does not depend on any package that has it. I suggest moving %license to
libs, it should be required explicitly from other subpackages then.
Licensecheck also mentions other licenses than GPLv2+:
GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or later)
-------------------------------------------------
osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/src/getopt/getopt.c
osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/src/getopt/getopt.h
GPL (v3 or later)
-----------------
osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/cmake/Modules/Version.cmake
osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/include/rds_mod.h
osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/src/rds_mod.c
getopt seems not used by our compilation, but rds_mod is. I think Licenses:
GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ should be used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component