Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749132
--- Comment #6 from Ricardo Rocha <rocha.porto(a)gmail.com> 2011-11-03 05:54:27 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> > The main one for now is dpm-dsi-libs or not since then I can actually
> > install to check.
>
> I added a dependency on the base package, following this:
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
>
> but this means also the rest (daemon scripts, sysconfig, etc) will get
> installed. It's ok, but would be better to break it into -libs and depend on
> that one instead?
Breaking out a libs pkg can makes sense, it means you will
get the 32bit libs in the 64 bit repos.
However is anyone ever going to want the libraries and not the service and
start up scripts. People are unlikely to link to this library I
would have thought? Up to you.
I'll leave it as it is then, noone should be linking against the library.
Is gssapi_openssl.h not just an old version of
$ rpm -qf /usr/include/globus/gssapi.h
globus-gssapi-gsi-devel-7.8-1.fc15.x86_64
Don't think so. The original is part of the globus source:
http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/library/gssapi_op...
Ricardo
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.