https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162076
--- Comment #1 from Mihkel Vain <turakas(a)gmail.com> ---
Ok.
A few notes first.
Group: Amusements/Games
This is not required anymore, unless you plan to target EL5
%doc %{_docdir}/tuxanci-%{version}
I think you should include bundled README, LICENSE and AUTHORS file in doc like
this:
%doc README LICENSE AUTHORS
No need for %{_docdir}/tuxanci-%{version} under %files section
rpmlint output:
Checking: tuxanci-0.21.0-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
tuxanci-0.21.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
tuxanci.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multiplayer -> multiplier,
multiplexer
tuxanci.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiplayer ->
multiplier, multiplexer
tuxanci.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/tuxanci-0.21.0/LICENCE
tuxanci.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tuxanci-0.21.0
tuxanci.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tuxanci
tuxanci.x86_64: E: invalid-appdata-file /usr/share/appdata/tuxanci.appdata.xml
tuxanci.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multiplayer -> multiplier,
multiplexer
tuxanci.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiplayer -> multiplier,
multiplexer
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
Spelling look correct to me, so we can ignore those. Manual pages are SHOULD
according to packaging guidelines, but not a blocker.
$ appdata-validate --relax 1162076-tuxanci/srpm-unpacked/tuxanci.appdata.xml
also return no errors, so I don't know why rpmlint reports about
invalid-appdata-file. This should be ok too. But this one:
tuxanci.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/tuxanci-0.21.0/LICENCE
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address
You must inform upstream about that, but I think this is not a blocker either.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component