Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245
--- Comment #19 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-20 10:44:23 EDT
---
first round done
rmplint squirrelmail.spec is quiet
rmplint squirrelmail-*-src.rpm is quiet
lot of not used/not useful/obsolete patches removed, some of them are not
removed from cvs repository *for now*
rpmlint noarch/squirrelmail-*-noarch.rpm is little less verbose (just a little)
htaccess-file
moved to squirrelmail.conf
W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.12.txt
W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.13.txt
fixed with sed in spec
E: zero-length
/usr/share/squirrelmail/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/serversidefilter.po.new
removed in spec
W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/filters/bulkquery/bulkquery.c
E: non-executable-script /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/demo/getpot 0644
I still haven't decided what to do with these two... (not only demo/getpot but
demo/*)
1) move to /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail
2) remove completely
3) move to subpackage
----------
Tomas, if you could explain me (irc?) something about the utf-8 vs. CJK mess,
it would be really appreciated. I've got this package with some fixes for CJK
and that confuses me... I thought utf-8 should be able to handle it, so I'm
little bit confused about all CJK workarounds/patches.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.