https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
OK, that makes sense. Adjusted in place:
$ rpm -qpP
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/systemd-boot-251\~rc1-2.fc37.x86_64.rpm
bundled(systemd-udev) = 251~rc1-3.fc37
systemd-boot = 251~rc1-2.fc37
systemd-boot(x86-64) = 251~rc1-2.fc37
$ rpm -qpi
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/systemd-boot-251\~rc1-2.fc37.x86_64.rpm
...
Built from systemd-udev-251~rc1-3.fc37.x86_64.
Not sure how to verify the bootctl scriptlet works thou.
All the scriptlet does is call 'bootctl update'. So you can just run that as
root on a machine
with sd-boot installed, and it should give the same result:
$ sudo bootctl update
Copied "/usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi/systemd-bootx64.efi" to
"/boot/efi/EFI/systemd/systemd-bootx64.efi".
Copied "/usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi/systemd-bootx64.efi" to
"/boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI".
It might turn out that the scriplets are too verbose. This can be easily
adjusted later,
and it's easier to start with more logs to catch any mistakes…
And of course I have no idea if the signed package will actually pass SB
checks. I think
it should, but this will need to wait for the official build. (And even if it
does *not* pass,
we shouldn't be any worse of than now.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784