https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #67 from Michal Vala <mvala(a)redhat.com> ---
Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with
classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self
requires we are done here. Can you publish one more spec+srpm (eventually
also with scratch) which we can test?
.build-id is clarified by Fabio Valentini and self requires seems to be correct
in latest state.
Jonny: Can you please add requires java/java-devel and I suggest licenses as
GPL2 with classpath exception + BSD for fxpackager?
If no-one has any other comments and you include these changes, I'll approve
this review.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component