https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858239
Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.co
| |m
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.co
| |m
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
spec2scl.src: I: checking
spec2scl.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) specfiles -> spec files,
spec-files, specifiable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
spec2scl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US specfiles -> spec files,
spec-files, specifiable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
spec2scl.src: I: checking-url
https://bitbucket.org/bkabrda/spec2scl/ (timeout
10 seconds)
spec2scl.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/s/spec2scl/spec2scl-0.3.1.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
spec2scl.noarch: I: checking
spec2scl.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) specfiles -> spec files,
spec-files, specifiable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
spec2scl.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US specfiles -> spec
files, spec-files, specifiable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
spec2scl.noarch: I: checking-url
https://bitbucket.org/bkabrda/spec2scl/
(timeout 10 seconds)
spec2scl.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/spec2scl/settings.py
spec2scl.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spec2scl
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
spec2scl.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/s/spec2scl/spec2scl-0.3.1.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
The spelling errors and the missing manpage could be ignored, the latter one
could be worth a hint to the upstream developer, if a manpage would make sense.
The file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/spec2scl/settings.py is empty,
although settings.pyo seems to contain some data. My knowledge about Python
bytecode is poor, could you explain that please? If the rpmlint message is
false positive, your package is ready for a full review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.