https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576413
--- Comment #36 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Marian Csontos from comment #35)
We must be looking at different yum.spec files, as the one I have
opened has
everything in the package %{name}.lang, including %config, launcher, and
python modules.
I think dnf is the closest to what you have proposed and fitting boom, but
IMHO that split is partially driven by having support for both python2 and
python3, and in our case does not make that much sense.
Also main package in dnf is only the launcher (and man page and
bash-completion), this requiring either python2 or python3 module, and both
those modules require the common conf subpackage - so conf is required by
python module, and not the other way.
May be antipattern was not the best choice. But in this case that pattern
does not fit - the configuration is required by python module, so should be
either included, or python module should require the configuration
subpackage, just like dnf does.
Big thanks for all your time!
I just think that it's "surprising" for people and they're not likely to
find
the boom boot manager if it's called "python3-boom". Our rules say python
modules that other people are supposed to be able to use should be
`python3-<foo>`, but they are specifically silent on what you should do with
the rest of it.
Whatever...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component