Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Blocks|182235 |
--- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-10
12:47:34 EDT ---
When no other information is available, and we have a high degree of confidence
that the website is maintained/created by the copyright holder of the licensed,
we can use it as licensing intent (or versioning intent).
It's always preferrable to get upstream to clarify this specifically, which
you've done. Ideally, you'll want to get upstream to specifically note this in
the source tarball, with proper code attribution (see:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-howto.html , search for "copying
permission statement").
Lifting FE-Legal.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.