Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644135
Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-03 10:53:21 EDT ---
Full review done:
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
miglayout.noarch: W: no-documentation
miglayout-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs -> Java
docs, Java-docs, Javanese
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These can all be ignored
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (BSD) OK, text not in %doc, but that is normal for BSD, all
source files do have BSD copyright headers
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on f14 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- javadocs in -javadoc subpackage
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
Now that is how easy all reviews should be, this is one well done package :)
APPROVED!
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.