https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238751
--- Comment #13 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #12)
> > 10. Please bump the BuildRequires from "rust-packaging
>= 21" to
> > "cargo-rpm-macros".
> > The "rust-packaging" package no longer exists and is only provided
by
> > "cargo-rpm-macros" for backwards compatibility.
>
> ok
I don't know what happened here, the new line is
BuildRequires: rust-srpm-macros >= 24
- which is wrong. The rust-srpm-macros package is included in the default
buildroot, and does not contain the cargo RPM macros.
When I said to replace the "rust-packaging >= 21" BR with just
"cargo-rpm-macros", I meant what I said 😅
oh ok.. I screwed up. I couldn't easily find any rust package using that btw.
fixed
Other than that, thank you for the update, looks good.
Not sure if rutabaga-gfx-ffi or rutabaga-gfx would be the better package
name (since the -ffi suffix is meaningless here) though, but that's your
decision.
Well, I named it after the lib and .pc, I think it's more straightforward this
way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238751
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...