[Bug 1636668] New: Review Request: <main package name here> - <
short summary here>
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636668
Bug ID: 1636668
Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short
summary here>
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: johnhford(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://johnford.org/wxHexEditor.spec
SRPM URL: http://johnford.org/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description: wxHexEditor is a graphical hex editor that I like
Fedora Account System Username: jhford (also have john64, but not using it any
more)
This is not my first package, but the first in just under 10 years. It is the
first time using a new FAS account "jhford", which is what I'd rather use from
now on. The docs said to include background information which might be
relevant. I have worked for Mozilla on the release engineering team, the
Firefox OS build team and currently on our CI platform. I have been doing peer
review for software for the last 10 years. I tried to follow the various
packaging docs as best as I could, but there's 5 different wiki pages to
follow.
I cannot find contact details for the author of the tool, so I haven't been in
touch yet. There's 3 patches relating to the build system. I would like to
upstream them, but they're so specific to building that they're not likely
worth the effort unless the tool is packaged into Fedora.
The license is slightly unclear...
5 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or *
6 * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License *
7 * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 *
8 * of the License.
I used GPLv2 because I believe that to be accurate. I'm not sure what exactly
is meant here, but I will clarify with the author if I can get in contact. I
don't know if it was meant as "Either the GPLv2 or later" or not, so I'd like
to be safe until I can clarify with the author.
There's a failure on AArch64 and Armv7hl. I think it's in the base Wx Widget
library, and I haven't dug into it yet. I will attach the errors to this bug
(if I can) or I will comment with their contents. Apparently, I'm supposed to
file a bug for this, but I suspect that I should wait for this package to be
accepted (or rejected) before doing that.
I'm not sure what to do about sha256. Should I download the tarball, compute
the sha256 and manually validate it in the spec file, or is having a sha256
something that the Fedora infrastructure would take care of?
Here's a link to a successful Koji run:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30074603
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5 years, 7 months
[Bug 1639089] New: Review Request: ghcid - GHCi based bare bones IDE
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639089
Bug ID: 1639089
Summary: Review Request: ghcid - GHCi based bare bones IDE
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghcid.spec
SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghcid-0.7.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description:
Either "GHCi as a daemon" or "GHC + a bit of an IDE". A very simple Haskell
development tool which shows you the errors in your project and updates them
whenever you save. Run 'ghcid --topmost --command=ghci', where '--topmost'
makes the window on top of all others (Windows only) and '--command' is the
command to start GHCi on your project (defaults to 'ghci' if you have a '.ghci'
file, or else to 'cabal repl').
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5 years, 7 months