[Bug 820115] New: Review Request: leptonica - C library for efficient image processing and image analysis operations
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: leptonica - C library for efficient image processing and image analysis operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820115
Summary: Review Request: leptonica - C library for efficient
image processing and image analysis operations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dchen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica-1.68-2.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
The library supports many operations that are useful on
* Document images
* Natural images
Fundamental image processing and image analysis operations
* Rasterop (aka bitblt)
* Affine transforms (scaling, translation, rotation, shear)
on images of arbitrary pixel depth
* Projective and bi-linear transforms
* Binary and gray scale morphology, rank order filters, and
convolution
* Seed-fill and connected components
* Image transformations with changes in pixel depth, both at
the same scale and with scale change
* Pixel<-wise masking, blending, enhancement, arithmetic ops,
etc.
Ancillary utilities
* I/O for standard image formats (jpg, png, tiff, bmp, pnm, gif, ps)
* Utilities to handle arrays of image-related data types (e.g., pixa,
boxa, pta)
* Utilities for stacks, generic arrays, queues, heaps, lists; number
and string arrays; etc.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 750997] New: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Alias: scilab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750997
Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: c.david86(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Depends on: 472639,730970
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Spec URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/scilab.spec
SRPM URL: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/scilab-5.3.3-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: Scilab is a scientific software package for numerical computations
providing a powerful open computing environment for engineering and scientific
applications.
Rpmlint: http://davidcl.fedorapeople.org/scilab-rpmlint.log
Not empty, but I already fixed :
incorrect-fsf-adress
zero-length
spurious-executable-perms
file-not-utf8
class-path-in-manifest
non-executable-script
Justification for others (need comments):
unexpanded-macro : not applicable as a %foo_bar macro has a specific
meaning (overload) in Scilab.
devel-file-in-non-devel-package : libs needed for dynamic link
file-not-in-%lang : not applicable to .mo (Modelica) files
backup-file-in-package : repositories.orig is used for testing
uncompressed-zip : toolbox_7_1.0-1.bin.zip is used for testing
incorrect-fsf-adress :
look_for_text.sci and unhilite_modelica_block.sci has the right fsf
address, what's wrong there ?
no-manual-page-for-binary :
is the javahelp sufficient or should I import debian man pages ?
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-science/packages/scilab/trunk/deb...
files
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 8 months
[Bug 857730] New: Review Request: oscpack - A set of C++ classes for packing and unpacking OSC packets
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857730
Bug ID: 857730
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Summary: Review Request: oscpack - A set of C++ classes for
packing and unpacking OSC packets
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: brendan.jones.it(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
Open Sound Control (OSC) is a content format for messaging among computers,
sound synthesizers, and other multimedia devices that are optimized for modern
networking technology.
oscpack is simply a set of classes for packing and unpacking OSC packets.
SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/oscpack-1.0.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/oscpack.spec
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: oscpack-1.0.2-2.fc16.src.rpm
oscpack-1.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
oscpack-debuginfo-1.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
oscpack-devel-1.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
oscpack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespaces -> name spaces,
name-spaces, names paces
oscpack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
oscpack.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespaces -> name
spaces, name-spaces, names paces
oscpack.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscDump
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscSendTests
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscReceiveTest
oscpack.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary OscUnitTests
oscpack-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint oscpack-debuginfo
oscpack-debuginfo.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 8 months