[Bug 510969] New: New Package IDE for vala
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: New Package IDE for vala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510969
Summary: New Package IDE for vala
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: bioinfornatics(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=351409)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=351409)
SPEC file
Val(a)IDE is an Intergrate Developpement Environnement for
the Vala programming language.
RPMLINT issue:
_____________________________________________________________________
$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/valide-0.5.1-275svn.0.2.fc11.x86_64.rpm
valide.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libvalide-0.0.so
valide.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/valide/licenses/None
valide.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/valide-0.5/plugins/opened-documents/opened-documents.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
valide.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/valide-0.5/plugins/todo/todo.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
valide.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/valide-0.5/plugins/completion/completion.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
valide.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/valide-0.5/libvalide/valide-0.0.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
valide.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/valide-0.5/plugins/file-browser/file-browser.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
valide.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/valide-0.5/plugins/symbol/symbol.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
valide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/valide.mo
valide.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/valide.desktop
.desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 8 warnings.
_____________________________________________________________________
$ rpmlint -i
rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/valide-debuginfo-0.5.1-275svn.0.2.fc11.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
_____________________________________________________________________
$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SRPMS/valide-0.5.1-275svn.0.2.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 449393] New: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393
Summary: Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pbrobinson(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/prism.spec
SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/prism-0.9-0.1.cvs20080416.fc9.src.rpm
This is my first hack at getting prism for Fedora. The spec file is based on a
very hacked up copy of the firefox.spec file. It includes a full copy of the
mozilla source code (like xulrunner and firefox) as you need the mozilla build
system to be able to build it (see b.m.o # 381900 for details) and a horrid
install section as the mozilla build system returns "Prism can't be installed
directly." on a 'make install' although I can't be sure that's not due to my
patches to allow the build of prism without doing a full mozilla build. Loads of
feedback welcome :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 513543] New: Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543
Summary: Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC
bouncer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: nb(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra.spec
SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
0.074 of ZNC is not pushed to stable yet (I just submitted it tonight), you
will either have to grab it from koji or wait for it to be pushed, this package
Requires: znc = %{version} and BuildRequires: znc-devel = %{version}
Source is not available at the URL in the spec, because the znc-extra source is
still named 0.072, no changes were made to the znc-extra source for 0.074, but
it is necessary to have the versions the same because the modules have to be
compiled against the version of ZNC that they are to work with.
[nb@nb-desktop SPECS]$ rpmlint znc-extra.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[nb@nb-desktop SRPMS]$ rpmlint znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[nb@nb-desktop i586]$ rpmlint znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11.i586.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[nb@nb-desktop i586]$ rpmlint znc-extra-debuginfo-0.074-1.fc11.i586.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months