Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de 2009-07-03 10:42:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora.
Why?
Fedora's mission is to be a "leading edge distro", not a "bleeding edge" distro, consisting of more or less non-functional, immature packages.
IMO, this package is not unlikely of the latter kind.
That is your opinion, not mine or others I've spoken to, its not a topic for a bug report.
A package's maturity/quality is topic within a review.
But its a much used method within packages.
Yes, these packages and your specs are of low quality.
Packaging guidelines discussions are for the mailing list.
Free free to continue shipping these apparently dysfunctional low quality packages.
My advise to reviewers: Do not approve this package in this current shape.