Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-07-27 15:16:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36)
(In reply to comment #33)
(In reply to comment #32)
I just removed the %exclude statement and built using F11 (since I won't be packaging this for F10 anyway).
.. but won't you be building for EPEL, if you need this for pymol?
Right... in that case, using rm -f in %install isn't enough - brp-python-bytecompile runs after %install, so it just recreates the .pyc/.pyo files. The other option is to rename the files so they don't have a .py extension, but I'm not sure if that will break other tools. Could I just use a different spec file for the F-10 and EPEL branches?
Duh.
Yes, you can use a different spec file, or even better:
%if 0%{?fedora}<11 || 0%{?rhel} == 4 || 0%{?rhel} == 5 %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyc %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyo %endif