Hi Dan,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 03:26:14PM +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
Hi Michel,
Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma(a)fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be a good idea to have a packager group for Ocaml, similar to
> what we already have for Python, Rust, and (sssh) Lua?
>
> Benefit: for those who are not active in this list, getting a request to
> add a packaging group to help co-maintain a package probably feels more
> trustworthy than getting asked by an individual packager.
>
> Also, as (hopefully) we get more expert packagers - I definitely won't
> volunteer to be put in this group right now (I'm in the other three) -
> these can get added to the group and don't have to manually ask for
> access to individual packages.
I don't disagree with you, but I think it will not make a huge
difference at the end of the day, because the most active OCaml
packagers are Jerry and Rich [1] who are already proven packagers anyway.
...
Footnotes:
[1] I do not intend to downplay anyone's contributions here, this is
just my personal observation.
Oh, no disagreement there, I agree 100% with this observation.
PS Dan, I can't reply directly to you as your domain is... not found?
whois says it's expiring soon (2022-01-19) and dig/host on both my
personal and work networks and using
https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/dig/ fails
```
id 13163
opcode QUERY
rcode SERVFAIL
flags QR RD RA
;QUESTION
cgc-instruments.com. IN MX
;ANSWER
;AUTHORITY
;ADDITIONAL
```
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities:
https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2