Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2012-03-10 02:29:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We ship the ocaml language so ideally we need to fix it for our customers that
> do use it. Emailed ocaml to confirm if they're done fixing it.
Where is this email?
Anyway, upstream haven't started fixing it. There is
opposition from people who want Hashtbl to work
reproducibly (naturally without them having to make any
changes to their code nor to their workflow).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried <kseifried(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(kseifried@redhat. |
|com) |
--- Comment #2 from Kurt Seifried <kseifried(a)redhat.com> 2012-03-09 19:30:32 EST ---
We ship the ocaml language so ideally we need to fix it for our customers that
do use it. Emailed ocaml to confirm if they're done fixing it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.