2009/6/13 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>
2009/6/12 Stephen Shaw <sshaw(a)decriptor.com>
> 2009/6/12 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > 2009/6/11 Stephen Shaw <sshaw(a)decriptor.com>
> >>
> >> Any chance that someone was able to test out those spec files? They
> >> should have fedora 11 in the openSUSE Build Service soon, so as soon
> >> as they do that I can test them here as well. Should I be creating
> >> bugs for each of these spec files?
> >
> > I apologize for not having had time to do this work, but I will see to
> it
> > tomorrow. I have been buried in other work for a while but tomorrow
> should
> > present a few hours of peace and quiet to test these for you.
> >
> > Also congratulations on your newly appointed openSUSE council seat.
> >
> > - David
>
>
> Thanks!!! I figured that I'd add that as well since I don't have a
> ton of thing on my plate ;)
>
> Also, thanks for taking a look at the packages... I did move the
> fedora directory up a level. I'm not sure what's taking so long to
> get fedora up and running on the openSUSE Board System, but as soon as
> its there I'll start trying to get them up there as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
First up:
the base build mono-uia which we have reviewed still do not apply the patch
I provided which means it will not assemble a valid rpm on Fedora x86_64.
Then when you try to install it in asks for mono(WindowsBase) 3.0.0.0 I
assume our winforms or something requires updating but I will need your
insight here.
Well doh, it helps when I actually install the mono-wincorefx package. Okay
time for more coffee