On Jun 13, 2009, at 3:45 AM, David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/6/13 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>
2009/6/13 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>
2009/6/12 Stephen Shaw <sshaw(a)decriptor.com>
2009/6/12 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com>:
>
>
> 2009/6/11 Stephen Shaw <sshaw(a)decriptor.com>
>>
>> Any chance that someone was able to test out those spec files?
They
>> should have fedora 11 in the openSUSE Build Service soon, so as
soon
>> as they do that I can test them here as well. Should I be creating
>> bugs for each of these spec files?
>
> I apologize for not having had time to do this work, but I will
see to it
> tomorrow. I have been buried in other work for a while but
tomorrow should
> present a few hours of peace and quiet to test these for you.
>
> Also congratulations on your newly appointed openSUSE council seat.
>
> - David
Thanks!!! I figured that I'd add that as well since I don't have a
ton of thing on my plate ;)
Also, thanks for taking a look at the packages... I did move the
fedora directory up a level. I'm not sure what's taking so long to
get fedora up and running on the openSUSE Board System, but as soon as
its there I'll start trying to get them up there as well.
Thanks,
Stephen
First up:
the base build mono-uia which we have reviewed still do not apply
the patch I provided which means it will not assemble a valid rpm on
Fedora x86_64. Then when you try to install it in asks for
mono(WindowsBase) 3.0.0.0 I assume our winforms or something
requires updating but I will need your insight here.
Well doh, it helps when I actually install the mono-wincorefx
package. Okay time for more coffee
In Fedora 11 we only have
gtk-sharp2-2.12.7-4.fc11.x86_64
Is there a special reason you require 2.12.8 or can we lower the
requirement? If not I will need to request an update of this package
before we can proceed.
_____________________________
You are awesome! I believe that there is a hard req for 2.12.8. We
have been putting work into that atk stuff.
As for the dbus package, please ignore it for now. I was purely
interested in making sure that the spec file was ready.
As soon as I get to my computer I'll look at those patch and either
apply them or put them I'm the fedora directory in svn. Since
openSUSE is the primary target we have to play by the mono teams
rules. Infortunately it's the odd one out. Maybe one day? I'm going
to at least try to keep our spec files as closer as I can other then
the arch issue.
Thanks again!!!
Stephen