On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 9:29 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <jlovejoy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 1/3/23 12:39 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> Separately, but related to Florian's question, I think we
should make
> clear in documentation (if we don't already) that fedora-license-data
> is not intended to deal with questions about license compliance,
> except to the extent that impossibility or impracticality of
> compliance with a license may be a reason for concluding that it is
> not allowed.
not sure where to put that or what exactly to say... did you have an idea?
as a threshold question, should that note go in the license-data repo
itself or the Fedora-legal documentation?
I think it should go in the legal documentation. The issue is really
the nonsuitability of the fedora-license-data issue tracker for
handling compliance questions.