On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:12 PM Richard Fontana
<rfontana(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:55 PM Christian Krause <chkr(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
>> COPYING.GLAD contains:
>> - an MIT license (although "Software" is substituted with
"materials")
>> - an Apache 2.0 license
>> - another MIT license
>> -> SPDX: MIT AND Apache-2.0
> The Khronos license uses "the Materials" instead of "the
Software".
> There was a recent issue in
github.com/spdx/license-list-XML about
> this, I forget where SPDX ended up on this (whether to revise `MIT` or
> to create a new identifier), check the SPDX issues or wait for Jilayne
> to chime in. :)
There is already this open issue:
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/238
although that is about a different version of the license with an
additional admonition paragraph. The SPDX issue is:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2017
I'm not clear on whether the SPDX issue is considering the
non-admonition variant.
correct the "old" Khronos license has been
accepted.
I'm not sure if we have a separate issue as to "materials" v.
"software"
in the regular MIT, but I have a recollection we discussed on one of the
SPDX-legal calls.
Will check...
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue