On 03/02/12 12:00, legal-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Send legal mailing list submissions to
> legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> legal-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> legal-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of legal digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. ii package license (Petr Šabata)
> 2. Re: ii package license (Josh Boyer)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:04:57 +0100
> From: Petr Šabata <contyk(a)redhat.com>
> To: legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: [Fedora-legal-list] ii package license
> Message-ID: <20120203090457.GA27116(a)rincewind.brq.redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear list,
>
> I'm packaging the ii IRC client [1] for Fedora and the
> package reviewer has expressed concerns about its license.
> This software includes, in addition to the main MIT-licensed
> code, the following script:
>
>
http://hg.suckless.org/ii/file/d163c8917af7/query.sh
>
> I've decided to use "MIT and Public domain" as the package
> license. Would that be correct?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Petr
>
> [1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784589
>