On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:53:49AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:43 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses. Is this because it is non-free,
> or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the
> license is APSL 2.0) ?
>
> I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would
> make it non-free. But I'm no expert on this stuff ...
>
> [1]
http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.0.txt
See
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/historical-apsl.html
Interesting, thanks.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my OCaml programming blog:
http://camltastic.blogspot.com/
Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora