On 01/31/2012 04:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tom Callaway wrote:
> So, from a purely license compliance perspective, shipping the apidocs
> without the matching sources in Fedora is a no-go. It's also a no-go
> from a "everything must be built from source" rule.
That (both parts) is what I already told Rex, too, he just wouldn't believe
Our current approach of building kdelibs-apidocs as a subpackage of kdelibs
looks compliant to me though, isn't it?
Yes, but I circle back to the original question I posed:
Is this package really valuable?
Does anyone really want 235MB of apidocs, especially given the legal
complexity/concerns, and the availability of these docs on the kde.org