On 06/12/2017 04:44 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Good afternoon,
> I'm VincentS, a newbie on fedora packaging. I contact you about
> precisions on licenses for a new package.
> Here is the log about sources licenses.
> There is different licenses for all files. We think package license must
> be GPLv2+ and MIT and CC BY-SA.
> Did I forget anything? What do you think about this?
> Thanks in advance for your reply.
Well, I haven't audited the source directly, but it looks like you have
a mix of interpreted code (Python) and compiled code (C++). Your
compiled code is LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and MIT. The interpreted code is
GPLv2+. If they both ended up in the same package, I would say that this
License: GPLv2+ and MIT and CC-BY-SA
If you wish, this is also correct:
License: GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and MIT) and CC-BY-SA