>>>> "DM" == Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net> writes:
DM> Hi. SciLab has changed its licence to CeCILLv2[1], which claims to
DM> be GPLv2+ compatible. I tried reading it and it gave me a
DM> headache. It seems to contain a few dubious passages[2]. Could RH
DM> Legal have a look at it and decide if it's OK to include code
DM> licensed under it in Fedora?
Well, CeCILLv2 is already on the license list as acceptable.
DM> Ideally, I'd like to have an answer for all four licences listed
DM> on this page, but CeCILLv2 would suffice for now.
There are three CeCILL licenses listed currently; which one is
missing?
- J<