On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:12 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:55 PM Christian Krause <chkr(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> COPYING.GLAD contains:
> - an MIT license (although "Software" is substituted with
"materials")
> - an Apache 2.0 license
> - another MIT license
> -> SPDX: MIT AND Apache-2.0
The Khronos license uses "the Materials" instead of "the Software".
There was a recent issue in
github.com/spdx/license-list-XML about
this, I forget where SPDX ended up on this (whether to revise `MIT` or
to create a new identifier), check the SPDX issues or wait for Jilayne
to chime in. :)
There is already this open issue:
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/238
although that is about a different version of the license with an
additional admonition paragraph. The SPDX issue is:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/2017
I'm not clear on whether the SPDX issue is considering the
non-admonition variant.
Richard