Hi Jason,
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
CK> Otherwise the package contains only GPLv3+ source. I have
two
CK> questions: What would be the correct License: entry in the spec
CK> file?
"GPLv3+ and MIT" if the MIT-licensed data files are included directly
into the package; I suppose just GPLv3+ if they are somehow compiled
into a binary with the GPL code. If the former, also include a
comment in the spec indicating which files are under which license.
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines for
more info
Thank you very much for the information. I've updated the spec
accordingly.
I'm looking forward that somebody reviews my new package. ;-)
Best regards,
Christian