On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 06:48:56PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 18:30 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:25:04PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I've updated extras^H^H^H^H^H^HFedora devel sparse to 0.3 and built it in
> > Koji. I have no clue if magic is required to get it into the tag used for
> > new builds' dependencies. The following ought to be adequate to tweak
the
> > kernel spec to use it rather than build it (assuming the old spec crap
> > wants to stick around conditionally for FC-6 copies).
>
> heh, I had this on my todo, but you moved quicker than I did :)
> given we're not moving FC-6 cvs over to the new repo, and that they
> already use disjunct spec files, we may as well make it unconditional.
>
> I don't think there's a great deal of point sparse'ing FC-6,
> (or even F7 once its out). Having it just a devel thing to
> check the latest tree seems to be more useful than checking the
> latest -stable release. comments?
Don't we want to make sure than when we push updates to FC-6 that the
sparse error logs aren't getting worse (relative to an earlier FC-6
kernel)? (or have I misunderstood the workflow here?)
Well, if we had infrastructure other than 'eyeballs & diff' to look over
then maybe, but until then, I don't think it really adds anything
other than slightly increasing buildtime.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk