Hello,
with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug [1]compilation of kmods started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ?
Thanks
[1] dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
[2] scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hello,
with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug [1]compilation of kmods started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ?
Thanks
[1] dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
[2] scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hi,
we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on rawhide for the past ~week.
Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though based on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel is then installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules which fails with
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
This is on x86_64.
Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not expected to work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or purely rawhide?
Thanks, Veronika
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hello,
with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug [1]compilation of kmods started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ?
Thanks
[1] dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
[2] scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hi,
we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on rawhide for the past ~week.
Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though based on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel is then installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules which fails with
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
This is on x86_64.
Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not expected to work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or purely rawhide?
Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with akmods of RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug or kernel-stabilization . I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on copr [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji .
Best regards,
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/kernel-stabilization/packag...
Thanks, Veronika
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Veronika Kabatova" vkabatov@redhat.com, "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:59:42 PM Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hello,
with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug [1]compilation of kmods started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ?
Thanks
[1] dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
[2] scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hi,
we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on rawhide for the past ~week.
Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though based on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel is then installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules which fails with
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
This is on x86_64.
Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not expected to work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or purely rawhide?
Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with akmods of RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug or kernel-stabilization . I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on copr [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji .
Thanks for the update! Unfortunately building in copr doesn't work for us.
ccing Don and Justin, have you ever run into this issue with building on rawhide?
Veronika
Best regards,
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/kernel-stabilization/packag...
Thanks, Veronika
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:57 AM Veronika Kabatova vkabatov@redhat.com wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Veronika Kabatova" vkabatov@redhat.com, "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:59:42 PM Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hello,
with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug [1]compilation of kmods started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ?
Thanks
[1] dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
[2] scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hi,
we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on rawhide for the past ~week.
Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though based on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel is then installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules which fails with
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
This is on x86_64.
Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not expected to work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or purely rawhide?
A mismatch of modules is definitely expected not to work. Fedora runs without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS because we do not in any way promise KABI. Because of this, if you want to run a module, it must be built with the same compiler/environment that the kernel you wish to insert it into is built. If you need out of tree modules, rawhide/nodebug kernels will need to be run in rawhide, or rebuilt against the version of Fedora you wish to run it on.
Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with akmods of RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug or kernel-stabilization . I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on copr [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji .
Thanks for the update! Unfortunately building in copr doesn't work for us.
ccing Don and Justin, have you ever run into this issue with building on rawhide?
I have not seen any issues, though I don't build any out of tree modules either.
Justin
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 10:05 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:57 AM Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@redhat.com
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Veronika Kabatova" vkabatov@redhat.com, "Kernel Fedora" < kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:59:42 PM Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hello,
with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug [1]compilation of kmods started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ?
Thanks
[1] dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
[2] scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hi,
we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on rawhide for the past ~week.
Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though based on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel is then installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules which fails with
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
This is on x86_64.
Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not expected to work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or purely rawhide?
A mismatch of modules is definitely expected not to work. Fedora runs without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS because we do not in any way promise KABI. Because of this, if you want to run a module, it must be built with the same compiler/environment that the kernel you wish to insert it into is built. If you need out of tree modules, rawhide/nodebug kernels will need to be run in rawhide, or rebuilt against the version of Fedora you wish to run it on.
I think [1] make it work , the problem is these binaries (fixdep, objtool and modpost) that are compiled in rawhide with a new glibc ...
[1] cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/basic/fixdep /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/basic/ cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/tools/objtool/objtool /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/tools/objtool/ cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/mod/modpost /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/mod/
Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with akmods of RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug or kernel-stabilization . I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on copr [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji .
Thanks for the update! Unfortunately building in copr doesn't work for us.
ccing Don and Justin, have you ever run into this issue with building on rawhide?
I have not seen any issues, though I don't build any out of tree modules either.
Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 17:55 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 10:05 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:57 AM Veronika Kabatova < vkabatov@redhat.com
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Veronika Kabatova" vkabatov@redhat.com, "Kernel Fedora" < kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:59:42 PM Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hello,
with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug [1]compilation of kmods started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ?
Thanks
[1] dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
[2] scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
Hi,
we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on rawhide for the past ~week.
Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though based on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel is then installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules which fails with
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
This is on x86_64.
Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not expected to work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or purely rawhide?
A mismatch of modules is definitely expected not to work. Fedora runs without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS because we do not in any way promise KABI. Because of this, if you want to run a module, it must be built with the same compiler/environment that the kernel you wish to insert it into is built. If you need out of tree modules, rawhide/nodebug kernels will need to be run in rawhide, or rebuilt against the version of Fedora you wish to run it on.
I think [1] make it work
Hi,
As the copy didn't work, I tried this [2] that worked for me, ie akmods build kmod successfully for 5.10.0-0.rc7.20201211git33dc9614dc2
[2] cd /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc7.20201211git33dc9614dc20.97.fc34.x86_64 rm tools/objtool/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/fixdep cd tools/ make objtool cd .. make (I think just need to build fixdep again)
, the problem is these binaries (fixdep, objtool and modpost) that are compiled in rawhide with a new glibc ...
[1] cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/basic/fixdep /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/basic/ cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/tools/objtool/objtool /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/tools/objtool/ cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/mod/modpost /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/mod/
Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with akmods of RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel- nodebug or kernel-stabilization . I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on copr [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji .
Thanks for the update! Unfortunately building in copr doesn't work for us.
ccing Don and Justin, have you ever run into this issue with building on rawhide?
I have not seen any issues, though I don't build any out of tree modules either.
Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Justin Forbes" jmforbes@linuxtx.org, "Veronika Kabatova" vkabatov@redhat.com Cc: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Donald Zickus" dzickus@redhat.com, "Justin Forbes" jforbes@redhat.com Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 12:34:35 PM Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 17:55 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 10:05 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:57 AM Veronika Kabatova < vkabatov@redhat.com
wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com To: "Veronika Kabatova" vkabatov@redhat.com, "Kernel Fedora" < kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:59:42 PM Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sérgio Basto" sergio@serjux.com > To: "Kernel Fedora" kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM > Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version > `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep) > > Hello, > > with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug > [1]compilation of > kmods > started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ? > > > Thanks > > > [1] > dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update > > [2] > scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version > `GLIBC_2.33' > not > found > (required by scripts/basic/fixdep) >
Hi,
we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on rawhide for the past ~week.
Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though based on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel is then installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules which fails with
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
This is on x86_64.
Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not expected to work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or purely rawhide?
A mismatch of modules is definitely expected not to work. Fedora runs without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS because we do not in any way promise KABI. Because of this, if you want to run a module, it must be built with the same compiler/environment that the kernel you wish to insert it into is built. If you need out of tree modules, rawhide/nodebug kernels will need to be run in rawhide, or rebuilt against the version of Fedora you wish to run it on.
I think [1] make it work
Hi,
Hi,
As the copy didn't work, I tried this [2] that worked for me, ie akmods build kmod successfully for 5.10.0-0.rc7.20201211git33dc9614dc2
[2] cd /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc7.20201211git33dc9614dc20.97.fc34.x86_64 rm tools/objtool/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/fixdep cd tools/ make objtool cd .. make (I think just need to build fixdep again)
interesting. For us the problem appeared as we were trying to rebuild fixdep and a few other tools. Instead of trying to add more workarounds we moved on the fix Justin suggested, not mixing rawhide and fc33 -- we did that for a good year and everything worked until now but if it's not officially supported then we may run into future problems too. The errors are gone with that step.
Veronika
, the problem is these binaries (fixdep, objtool and modpost) that are compiled in rawhide with a new glibc ...
[1] cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/basic/fixdep /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/basic/ cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/tools/objtool/objtool /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/tools/objtool/ cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/mod/modpost /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/mod/
Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with akmods of RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel- nodebug or kernel-stabilization . I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on copr [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji .
Thanks for the update! Unfortunately building in copr doesn't work for us.
ccing Don and Justin, have you ever run into this issue with building on rawhide?
I have not seen any issues, though I don't build any out of tree modules either.
Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org