On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
<nicolas.mailhot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, I'm saying completeness should not be a requirement to create
a new
language group, but the aim should be to help people identify the
missing bits so they can ping someone else (like you:;)) to provide
them.
Got it. I guess this really means I should try to document the
process, like the great documentation I'm seeing at the fonts sig!
(not that i can reach the quality ;))
Roozbeh