https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405433
--- Comment #3 from Petr Ĺ abata <psabata(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #2)
Is msghack self-standing (no explicit requires is fine)? I would
possibly
use the '%package -n msghack' so we could separate it out from gettext
later. Otherwise it looks fine to me.
It seems to be.
TBH, I'm still not fully oriented in gettext, so I'm rather
asking previous
maintainer what is the motivation to keep msghack etc.
Looking at comments like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192086#c2, it could be it's there
because no one's been brave enough to drop it yet ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.