On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Alexander Koksharov wrote:
Hello,
I would like to confirm whether we do want to completelly drop --no-sssd
option.
"no-sssd" configuration is not supported by authselect - there is not such
profile available.
If we drop dependency on authconfig there will be a need to do code cleanup
and also to rewrite related parts. And if we agreed on rewriting some parts
there wont be any problems replacing multiple calls to authconfig with a
single one to outhselect.
I think we should make sure authselect does support
non-sssd profile.
Otherwise it is not a real replacement for authconfig in Fedora.
Alexander
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Alexander Bokovoy <abokovoy(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On ke, 14 helmi 2018, Alexander Koksharov via FreeIPA-devel wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please take a look on a design page here:
>>
https://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Authselect_migration
>> I would like to
>> ??? ???
>> hear you critics and suggessions.
>>
> Thanks!
>
> One note I have is about authconfig arguments. We gather them together
> and launch only one authconfig command. There is, I believe, a
> conceptual difference when you run authconfig with all options in a
> single line and as separate executions so you'd get different
> configurations.
>
> This may be subtle on a first view but we need to ensure that an
> authselect replacement would continue to provide the same configuration
> in the end.
>
>
> I assume you are going to add actual authselect part later.
> --
> / Alexander Bokovoy
>
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy