sparc_init would check the ELF class to register to correct core_note
handler. But sparc_register_info would check the ELF machine to determine
whether the register set was 32 or 64 bits. This caused some confusion
and assertion failures in readelf when printing core notes where the
sparc machine and class didn't seem to match up. Check the ELF class
in both sparc_unit and sparc_register_info to give consistent results.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mjw(a)redhat.com>
---
backends/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
backends/sparc_regs.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/backends/ChangeLog b/backends/ChangeLog
index c95e80f..4accedc 100644
--- a/backends/ChangeLog
+++ b/backends/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-09-03 Mark Wielaard <mjw(a)redhat.com>
+
+ * sparc_regs.c (sparc_register_info): Use ebl->class not ebl->machine.
+
2015-06-26 Pino Toscano <toscano.pino(a)tiscali.it>
* i386_initreg.c: Reduce scope of some includes to match their usage.
diff --git a/backends/sparc_regs.c b/backends/sparc_regs.c
index f9709bb..2bddcf4 100644
--- a/backends/sparc_regs.c
+++ b/backends/sparc_regs.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* Register names and numbers for SPARC DWARF.
- Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Red Hat, Inc.
+ Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2015 Red Hat, Inc.
This file is part of elfutils.
This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ sparc_register_info (Ebl *ebl,
const char **prefix, const char **setname,
int *bits, int *type)
{
- const int nfp = 32 + (ebl->machine == EM_SPARC ? 0 : 16);
- const int nspec = ebl->machine == EM_SPARC ? 8 : 6;
+ const int nfp = 32 + (ebl->class == ELFCLASS32 ? 0 : 16);
+ const int nspec = ebl->class == ELFCLASS32 ? 8 : 6;
if (name == NULL)
return 32 + nfp + nspec;
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ sparc_register_info (Ebl *ebl,
if (regno < 0 || regno >= 32 + nfp + nspec || namelen < 6)
return -1;
- *bits = ebl->machine == EM_SPARC ? 32 : 64;
+ *bits = ebl->class == ELFCLASS32 ? 32 : 64;
*type = DW_ATE_signed;
*prefix = "%";
@@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ sparc_register_info (Ebl *ebl,
};
*setname = "control";
*type = DW_ATE_unsigned;
- if ((ebl->machine != EM_SPARC ? 0 : 4) + 1 - (unsigned int) regno <= 1)
+ if ((ebl->class == ELFCLASS64 ? 0 : 4) + 1 - (unsigned int) regno <= 1)
*type = DW_ATE_address;
- return stpncpy (name, names[ebl->machine != EM_SPARC][regno],
+ return stpncpy (name, names[ebl->class == ELFCLASS64][regno],
namelen) + 1 - name;
}
--
2.4.3
Show replies by date
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 12:59 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
sparc_init would check the ELF class to register to correct
core_note
handler. But sparc_register_info would check the ELF machine to determine
whether the register set was 32 or 64 bits. This caused some confusion
and assertion failures in readelf when printing core notes where the
sparc machine and class didn't seem to match up. Check the ELF class
in both sparc_unit and sparc_register_info to give consistent results.
I pushed this to master.