All:
We have been having some interesting discussions on #copyleft-next about technology things... And I asked:
07:11 < tmarble> of course now I'm worried about at what point we have a *substantive* discussion here that requires an HBR cure :)
Later Ben said:
07:16 < bcotton> of course, there's no mention of IRC at all in CONTRIBUTING.md
One view may be "the channel is public and that's enough". Another view may be... a logging bot which posts discussions on, say, copyleft-next.org may provide HBR absolution.
Thoughts?
--Tom
On 01/18/2013 10:18 AM, Tom Marble wrote:
All:
We have been having some interesting discussions on #copyleft-next about technology things... And I asked:
07:11 < tmarble> of course now I'm worried about at what point we have a *substantive* discussion here that requires an HBR cure :)
Later Ben said:
07:16 < bcotton> of course, there's no mention of IRC at all in CONTRIBUTING.md
One view may be "the channel is public and that's enough". Another view may be... a logging bot which posts discussions on, say, copyleft-next.org may provide HBR absolution.
Thoughts?
A logging bot is a good idea (though I am not sure it is strictly speaking required for HBR compliance). Indeed it can have value even if non-substantive discussions take place. Up till now I don't think #copyleft-next has been used for any substantive discussion, but maybe that will change someday.
- RF
copyleft-next@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Richard Fontana -
Tom Marble