Agent / Server Communications

Van Dillon vandillon at gmail.com
Mon Sep 16 14:35:27 UTC 2013


Greg,

Thanks for the reply.  Any code you can dig up would be helpful. Even if it
is out of date, it will still provide valuable information on your approach
to solving the problem.

Hopefully HornetQ has matured enough so that I won't run into the issues
you encountered.

Thanks,
Van



On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Greg Hinkle <greghinkle at gmail.com> wrote:

> John is right. My work is several years out of date at this point. I'll
> see if I can dig out my old repository, but there's probably not a lot you
> can use from it.
>
> My implementation was based on HornetQ, but to be honest, I had a lot of
> problems with it. Bugs, journal corruption and other issues made me abandon
> it after a few months in production. Though I can't say about the current
> state. I also had problems supporting SSL and certificate handling properly.
>
> For my part, I'd still love to get a version of RHQ that supports the
> following:
>
> * Unidirectional comms (agent calls server only)
> * SSL easily enabled (why not a default?)
> * Authenticated agent registration
>
> It's hard to use RHQ in a public cloud when SSL comms have  to use the
> public web endpoint in the current setup.
>
> -Greg
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:41 AM, John Mazzitelli <mazz at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Greg hasn't been working on the RHQ project for over a year. If he has
> code, no one knows where it is and it's probably not up to date. I don't
> know if he still lurks on this mailing list. If he is, you might want to
> ping him for his thoughts.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Hi Lucas,
> >>
> >> After putting some time into researching the project, I think I'm ready
> to
> >> start changing the communications layer as Greg Hinkle describes in the
> >> "Design-Agent-Server Communications 3" wiki entry.
> >>
> >> While going through the proposal again to extract requirements, I got
> the
> >> impression that Greg has already done some of the work. It seems likely
> from
> >> the way he talks about it. If Greg did start writing code, it would
> give me
> >> a head start if I could see it. Is there code available that I can look
> at?
> > _______________________________________________
> > rhq-devel mailing list
> > rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/rhq-devel/attachments/20130916/121271c2/attachment.html>


More information about the rhq-devel mailing list