[copyleft-next] Update 2012-09-08

Stephen Michael Kellat skellat at fastmail.net
Sun Sep 9 04:01:54 UTC 2012


On 09/08/2012 11:58 PM, Tom Marble wrote:
> On 09/08/2012 09:17 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
>> I removed the reference to the Open Source Definition in the
>> Proprietary-Relicensing section, because (to the extent I ever did) I
>> no longer consider the Open Source Definition to be a useful
>> definition of open source (a point I explained in my talk at LinuxCon).
> Presumably you are referring to...
> http://lcna2012.sched.org/event/55548175096c8c2912a6c6e87ff07551#.UEwTax-WthE
>
> Which was apparently paraphrased in the press, e.g.
> http://www.internetnews.com/blog/skerner/how-do-you-define-open-source-linuxcon.html
>
> Do you know if there is an original video (audio) available
> from this event.  I'd ask for "slides", but, you know, slides
> really don't tell the story!
>
> Regards,
>
> --Tom
>
A speaking outline would be fine in conjunction with slides.  Annotated
slides would be fabulous too.

Stephen Michael Kellat



More information about the copyleft-next mailing list