[copyleft-next] Update 2012-09-08

Tom Marble tmarble at info9.net
Sun Sep 9 03:58:51 UTC 2012


On 09/08/2012 09:17 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> I removed the reference to the Open Source Definition in the
> Proprietary-Relicensing section, because (to the extent I ever did) I
> no longer consider the Open Source Definition to be a useful
> definition of open source (a point I explained in my talk at LinuxCon).

Presumably you are referring to...
http://lcna2012.sched.org/event/55548175096c8c2912a6c6e87ff07551#.UEwTax-WthE

Which was apparently paraphrased in the press, e.g.
http://www.internetnews.com/blog/skerner/how-do-you-define-open-source-linuxcon.html

Do you know if there is an original video (audio) available
from this event.  I'd ask for "slides", but, you know, slides
really don't tell the story!

Regards,

--Tom



More information about the copyleft-next mailing list